dc.contributor.author | Nur Iffah Farwizah binti Anuar | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-15T07:55:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-15T07:55:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://e-ilami.unissa.edu.bn:8443/handle/20.500.14275/4883 | |
dc.description.abstract | Consent is the state of being willing or agree to do something. It is one of the principles
that must exist in a muamalat contract. Nowadays, coercive contracts exist not only in
sale and purchase, but also in rental contracts, mudharabah, wakaf and so forth. Any
muamalat contract is not being made based on the consent of both parties is considered
invalid. The purpose of this study is to identify the extent to which the importance of
this consent is applied in Islamic economic activities. Apart from that, this study also
describes how to assess a person’s willingness and the extent to which this principle is
practiced in the muamalat contract, is it limited to the at-tijarah contract only as
mentioned in the Al-Quran? Then whether the expression of a person's willingness in a
muamalat contract can change the legal status that was originally haram to halal? In
this study, the author has used Fiqh books as the main reference material. The author
utilised the descriptive method, through the collection and analysis of information and
also made use of modern sources especially articles as well as up to date information
available on the internet. The information is then collected and analyzed according to
the sections that correspond to the content. The study concluded that the willingness
was limited to the permissible contract. Furthermore, if a contract is permissible by the
syara’, a person’s willingness cannot make the contract to be valid for instance
hiring another party who is willing to kill a targeted person and some of the consent is
flawed by several factors such as coercion, except in the case of ihtikar that a person is
obliged to sell the public necessities that he monopolizes in order to protect the welfare
of people. The illegal contract such as usury (riba) also cannot legitimize the contract
because it contains illegal elements. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | Arabic | en_US |
dc.title | الرضا وأثره في المعاملات المالية في الفقه الإسلامي | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Kerelaan Dan Kesannya Terhadap Kegiatan Ekonomi Dalam Fiqh Islam | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Consent and Its Impact on Financial Transactions According to Islamic Jurisprudence | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.faculty | Faculty of Shariah and Law | en_US |
dc.supervisor | الدكتورة الحاجة مس نور عيني بنت الحاج محي الدين | en_US |
dc.studentID | 17B0022 | en_US |