|

  • Collection Type
    • Article
    • Book
    • Conference or Workshop Item
    • Guide Book
    • Hafl Al-Takharruj Collection
    • Newsletter
    • Newspaper
    • Video
    • Thesis
    • Examination paper
    • UNISSA Library Books
    • Chapter in Book
  • Faculty
    • Faculty of Usuluddin
    • Faculty of Shariah and Law
    • Faculty of Arabic Language
    • Faculty of Islamic Economics and Finance
    • Faculty of Islamic Development Management
  • Centre
    • Halalan Thayyiban Research
    • Mazhab Syafie Research Centre
  • External Links
    • Universiti Islam Sultan Sharif Ali
    • Open Journal System (OJS)
    • UNISSA Press Book Shop
    • LIbrary OPAC
  • Login
UNISSA Repository Wrapper
 
View Item 
  •   e-I'lami UNISSA
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • ARTICLE
  • View Item
  •   e-I'lami UNISSA
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • ARTICLE
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Recognition and Enforcement of International Arbitration Awards: A Case Study of Malaysia and Saudi Arabia

Date
2014-07-01
Author
Ahmad Masum
Nurli Bt Yaacob
Mohamed Fahmi Ghazwi
External Links

http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ ijafr.v4i2.6783

Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Recognition and enforcement are crucial elements of arbitration. Without the possibility for the winning party to enforce the arbitral award in its desired country, the whole arbitration process becomes pointless. This paper discusses the requirements for recognition and enforcement of international arbitration awards in Malaysia and Saudi Arabia. The paper aims to provide a clarification to the Arbitration law in both countries focusing mainly on the issue of the requirements regarding the recognition and enforcement of international arbitration awards. In this paper, both the Malaysian Arbitration Act 2005 and the Saudi Arbitration Act 2012 were compared with the Convention on Settlement of Investment Disputes 1965 (ICSID Convention). The methodology adopted in this paper was purely doctrinal in nature focusing mainly on the primary and secondary sources. On a final note, the paper concluded that the two Acts are less similar to the ICSID Convention when it comes to the requirements for recognition and enforcement of international arbitration awards. Hence, there is an urgent need for the two countries to adopt some form of reforms as far as the two Acts are concerned especially on the issue of reciprocity reservation‘ since it adds more complications to business transaction.
URI
https://e-ilami.unissa.edu.bn:8443/handle/20.500.14275/1135
Collections
  • ARTICLE [149]

2024   |   All rights reserved

e‐I'lami is managed by UNISSA Library and maintained by Elite Computer Systems Sdn. Bhd.

Universiti Islam Sultan Sharif Ali

Spg 347, Jalan Pasar Gadong BE 1310 Negara Brunei Darussalam

Office Call Number: +673 2462000 ext 603/604

library.unissa@unissa.bn


 

My Account

RegisterLogin

Browse

All of e-I'lamiCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

2024   |   All rights reserved

e‐I'lami is managed by UNISSA Library and maintained by Elite Computer Systems Sdn. Bhd.

Universiti Islam Sultan Sharif Ali

Spg 347, Jalan Pasar Gadong BE 1310 Negara Brunei Darussalam

Office Call Number: +673 2462000 ext 603/604

library.unissa@unissa.bn